The article presents a study of graduate and PhD students in an Agriculture Studies program, who were asked to contribute their own blog posts with reflections on class materials. The students were placed into two groups, one with a guided blog post assignment, and the other being allowed to contribute posts with self-selected response styles.
The study's purpose was to see if students displayed the six reflective types of thinking outlined by Facione in 1990 (p. 72). Critical thinking was evidenced by "(a) Interpretation, (b) Analysis, (c) Evaluation, (d) Inference, (e) Explanation, and (f) Self-Regulation" (p.75). Without dissecting the results too in-depth, the findings showed that the students in this study displayed more critical thinking in the "guided reflection" blog posts.
The second reason this study is valuable is that I believe it reflects what our class is doing with this blog. Personally, the weeks when I have to write an article summary are much more time intensive and thought provoking than the weeks when I'm left to find a supplemental piece. Except this week, of course.
And finally, I believe this article lends itself to a greater discussion of how exactly we can measure critical thinking. If students are asked to expand upon materials using their own reflection, instead of just summarizing, then what are the key points to evaluate? It really makes you think...
Cain, H., Giraud, V., Stedman, N. P., & Adams, B. L. (2012). Critical Thinking Skills Evidenced in Graduate Students Blogs. Journal Of Leadership Education, 11(2), 72-87.
Cain, H., Giraud, V., Stedman, N. P., & Adams, B. L. (2012). Critical Thinking Skills Evidenced in Graduate Students Blogs. Journal Of Leadership Education, 11(2), 72-87.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.