On January 18, 2012 Wikipedia and Google went dark. But this
wasn’t a power outage but a deliberate protest against the proposed Stop Online
Piracy Act, or SOPA. Introduced in October 2011, SOPA was a continuation in the
fight against online copyright infringement by aggressively pursuing and
prosecuting online service providers who utilize and/or promote websites that
feature copyrighted material. Essentially, its purpose was to make it even harder
and undesirable for individuals to not only gain access to but to share any information
deemed outside the public realm.
This week’s readings discussed the advent of the Internet,
the World Wide Web (the Web), and how users have been adapting this medium to create
faster ways to communicate and share the plethora of information we create
everyday with one another. As librarians, as information specialists, we are
keenly invested with providing easy access and dissemination points for this created
information. But as Dominic Rushe’s article reminds us there are other organizations
that are just as invested with denying this access and blocking online
dissemination points. It is a question of a free, open Web versus one ruled by,
what global free culture leader Elizabeth Stark calls, “a closed,
copyright-protected world from before the digital age.” Similarly, Jimmy Wales,
Wikipedia co-founder, believes that while copyright laws have some validity, “applying
these rules to the digital age isn't going to work.” For now, SOPA has been
defeated. The Internet fought back, which is to say that millions of Internet
users made their opinions heard. But only time will tell and I believe that library
professionals will have a big say in which way this battle goes.
Visit theguardian.com: battle for the internet series for more editorials and comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.